[00:00:02]
UM, THAT SECOND BIT, AND THEN WE HAVE OUR DISCUSSION, AND THEN AFTER THE DISCUSSION, THEN WE VOTE.
SO I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE EVERYONE'S ON UP AND UP ABOUT, UM, HOW THE ORDER WORKS HERE.
I'M SURE JT ISS GONNA HELP US OUT, UM, WITH A LOT OF THE PROCEDURE TOO.
UM, BUT, UH, WITH THAT, UH, I'D LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING, UH, FOR JANUARY 21ST.
UH, MR. CLERK, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
UM, MEMBER BAILEY, SAY THE FIRST NAME.
UH, VICE CHAIR ILI AND CHAIR VAN D**E.
ALRIGHT, SO FOR THE RECORD, UH, WHICH MEMBERS WEREN WERE NOT PRESENT FOR THE MEETING TODAY? OH.
UM, MEMBERS BIRDWELL, MEMBER GUAN, MEMBER HILLS CHIME.
AND, UH, MR. CLARK, WOULD YOU PLEASE READ THE FIRST ITEM? ITEM ONE IS, UH, THE RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 9TH, 2025.
ALRIGHT, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? SORRY, JUST TO, UH, MEMBER MALLORY AND MEMBER BROWN CHOCOLATE.
ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? UH, AND THEN, UH, YEAH, PLEASE CALL FOR THE NOTE.
MEMBER BROWN, SHOCK MEMBER CASTILLO HERE.
UH, OR IT'S, UH, YES OR NO? YES.
MOTION CARRIES THE SECOND ITEM.
ITEM TWO IS A RECOMMENDATION TO RE, TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE UPDATED HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS TABLE MOTION FOR THIS ITEM.
AND I BELIEVE MEMBER GOLDEN AND MEMBER MARY, IS THAT CORRECT? YES.
UM, THEN WE HAVE SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM.
UH, JUST TO REMIND FOLKS, UM, THIS IS THE REAL PURPOSE FOR THIS COMMITTEE, UM, TO REVIEW, UM, AND AFFIRM, UM, THAT ANALYSIS, DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT A LOCATION IS HAZARDOUS AND THEREFORE, UM, SHOULD BE ASSIGNED A SCHOOL GUARD.
UH, WE'VE GOT STAFF FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION HERE.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS, BUT, UH, IT'S ALRIGHT.
I'D LIKE TO HAVE, UH, MR. RYAN KELLY, UM, GIVE SOME UPDATE ON, UM, SOME OF THE CHANGES TO THE TABLE, UM, AND, UH, WHERE THOSE ARE COMING FROM.
RYAN KELLY, SENIOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER.
UH, SO YEAH, THIS TABLE, THE HAZARD LOCATIONS TABLE HAS CHANGED SLIGHTLY SINCE WE LAST MET.
UH, LAST TIME WE MET THERE WERE 13 CROSSING LOCATIONS.
UH, BY HERRERA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
UH, WE ANALYZE THAT LOCATION WITH MORE CURRENT TRAFFIC DATA.
AND BASED ON THAT DATA, UH, IT IS DEEMED A HAZARDOUS LOCATION.
THERE IS CURRENTLY A CROSSING GUARD THERE, SO THERE'S NO DECISION TO BE MADE OF ALL MEMBERS THERE.
UH, I'M JUST GIVING AN UPDATE ON THE CHANGES TO THE HAZARDOUS LOCATION TABLE.
UH, SO 17TH
UH, IT LY WAS ON, UH, SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION TABLE, UH, FOR NONHAZARDOUS LOCATIONS.
THERE WAS, UH, AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST.
THERE WERE SEVERAL ADDITIONAL REQUESTS FOR ADULT CROSSING DRIVE ME IN AND ONE OF 'EM ROSE TO THE LEVEL OF A HAZARDOUS LOCATION THAT WAS THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT PACIFIC NEAR LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
UH, THAT'S AN UNCONTROLLED LOCATION.
[00:05:01]
SEE THAT'S, UH, 15TH ROW HERE AND IT'S PROPOSED FOR MIDDLE CROSSING GUARD.THAT'S, IT MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR HAZARDOUS.
THOSE ARE THE CHANGES FOR THE TABLE.
WHY
YOU JUST DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ADVISOR.
I, UH, WELL YOU'LL SEE LATER ON IN THE AGENDA WE'RE PROPOSING SHIFTING TO CROSSING GUARDS FROM EXISTING LOCATIONS WHERE, WHICH OUR DEAN NOT HAVE USE.
SO THEN I, UM, SO WHAT CONSIDER HAZARD AREAS, WHAT ARE THOSE AREAS OF THOSE? WHAT'S HAZARDS? YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.
UM, THERE ARE, UH, SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS, WHETHER OR NOT THE CROSSING THAT THE STUDENTS ARE CROSSING IS UNCONTROLLED.
SO SOMETIMES, YOU KNOW, ON A MAJOR ARTERIAL, UH, THERE'S NO CONTROL FOR THE STREETS ON THE MAJOR STREET AND THERE'S STOP SIGNS ON THE CROSS STREET.
SO THERE'S CERTAIN CRITERIA FOR THAT SITUATION.
AND THEN, UH, INTERSECTIONS WHERE IT'S ALWAYS STOPPED, WHERE EVERYONE STOPPED.
AND IF IT'S A SIGNALED INTERSECTION, THERE'S SEPARATE CRITERIA.
IT'S BASED ON, UH, VOLUME OF SCHOOL AGE, PEDESTRIANS CROSSING AT THE CROSSING THAT NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 20 SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS.
AND THEN THERE ARE VOLUME REQUIREMENTS FOR THE, UH, UH, THE SPEED OF THE ROAD AT THESE PACKAGE AS WELL.
CAN YOU TELL ME IF YOU GUYS DONE A SURVEY ALREADY ON THIS ALREADY AT ALL? ALL THE CALLS YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE DONE A SURVEY AND SEEN HOW MANY PEOPLE CALL AND THAT, ALL THAT STUFF DONE IT ALREADY.
LAST, SO, SO I DO, SO WE ARE RUNNING THIS MEETING UNDER, UNDER SOME FORMAL RULES.
I'M NOT TRYING TO SAY GO THE MEETING, I'M JUST ASKING QUESTIONS.
I'M SAYING, SO LET, LET ME SHOW YOU HOW BEST TO DO THAT.
SO I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT EACH OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE HAVE TIME, WATCH, ASK QUESTIONS THERE, JUST PUBLIC COMMENT, UM, FOR THE MEETING.
AND THEN ALSO STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AFTER MEETING, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
BUT WE WANNA MAKE SURE WE GET TO THE BUSINESS OF ASSIGNMENTS.
YOU GOOD TO GO NOW? SO WE YEAH.
MORE THAN I'M SURE RYAN IS MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
WE JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE RESPECTING THE, THE AGENDA AND THANK YOU.
SO IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON, ON THE SEVENTH? OKAY.
HEARING NONE THEN, UH, YOU CAN MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENTS.
SO IF YOU HAVE A STATEMENT TO MAKE, UM, NOW'S THE TIME FOR A STATEMENT ABOUT THE TABLE.
AGAIN, IF THERE'S QUESTIONS, WE CAN ANSWER THEM AFTER THE WELL THE STATEMENT THAT I WOULD, THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IS THAT, UM, I CAUGHT THE PART WHERE YOU SAY CUTTING SOME OUT, YOU KNOW, BUT IF, IF, IF, IF YOU ARE SAYING THE CHILDREN ARE THE FUTURE, YOU'RE CUTTING OFF PARKING GUARD, YOU TAKING, YOU, TAKING, MAKING IT UNSAFE FOR THEM.
SO HOW CAN THEY BE OUR FUTURE IF YOU'RE NOT GONNA TAKE CARE OF THEM OUT THAT YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING? YEAH, GOOD POINT.
BECAUSE ALL KIDS NEED TO BE CROSS SAFETY AND JUST BY BEING OUT THERE, I HEAR SO MANY PEOPLE COME AND SAY, WELL WE NEED TO CROSS AND GUARD OVER HERE.
WE NEED TO CROSS AND GUARD OVER HERE.
AND JUST BEFORE WE WENT ON BREAK AT VILLE, I HAD UM, LONG FELL.
I THINK THAT LONG FELL AT ONE.
ACROSS THE STREETS OUT THERE, A KID GOT HIT.
I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT BECAUSE THE COURT, YOU HAD A CAUTION GUARD THAT THE KID GOT HIT.
SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE TO DO.
RIGHT? DETERMINE WHICH, WHICH LOCATIONS BASED ON OBJECTIVE FACTORS THAT ARE IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE, ALLOW US TO ASSIGN GUARDS.
AND SO THAT'S THE BUSINESS WE'RE TRYING TO PERFORM.
UM, SO HEARING, UH, DISCUSSION, HEARING, PUBLIC COMMENT, UM, UH, UNLESS THERE'S ANY OTHER FURTHER COMMENT, UH, LET PLAN ON TAKING THIS TO A VOTE.
UH, MR. CLARK, CAN YOU CALL FOR VOTE MEMBER BAILEY? UH, THE VOTE IS THERE TO APPROVE THE UPDATED HAZARDOUS LOCATION STATEMENTS.
WOULD YOU PLEASE, UM, READ THE THIRD AHEAD? OF COURSE.
ITEM THREE IS A RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE FINDINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 10.8, 10.68 OF THE LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE INSTALLATION OF A SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AND PACIFIC.
[00:10:03]
ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS, MALLORY AND GOLD? OKAY, THANK YOU.UM, SO THE PURPOSE OF YOUR RIGHT IS, UM, WE RECEIVED AND APPROVED THE HAZARDOUS LOCATION DESIGNATION.
UH, BUT THE NEXT FOLLOWING STEP IS FOR THE COMMITTEE TO THEN, UM, RECOMMEND THE PLACEMENT OF A GUARD AT ANY HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS THAT DO NOT HAVE THEM.
WE REPORT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON, ON WHAT'S HAPPENED WITH THAT.
SO CURRENTLY THE 15, I DON'T KNOW, JUST LEMME KNOW IF I'M OFF.
CURRENTLY THE 15TH DOES DO NOT HAVE CROSSING GUARD.
SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE TABLE, UM, THE FINAL COLUMN SAYS GUARD STATUS.
UM, THE ONES THAT SAY CURRENT HAVE A ARE CURRENTLY PLACED AT THAT LOCATION.
THE ONES THAT THE VACANT OR PROPOSED, UM, ARE THE ONES THAT STILL ASSIGNED.
UH, WHILE ALL OF THIS PROCEDURE HERE IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE REPLACING THE GUARD.
UM, AND THEN
UM, THAT IT DOES NEED TO BE, IN MY OPINION, IT'S MY OPINION IN IT NEEDS TO BE TWO, ONE ON EACH SIDE.
SO WHAT I WILL SAY IS, UH, YOU KNOW, OUR OFFICE CONSIDERS THIS TO BE AN INTERIM, UM, PLACEMENT BECAUSE WE DO HAVE FUNDING AND A PROJECT IN THE WORKS, UM, TO ACTUALLY SIGNALIZE INTERSECTION OF PACIFIC AND BURNETT.
SO, UM, IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE SIGNED GUARD THERE NOW BECAUSE WE HAVE THE HAZARD IS DESIGNATION, BUT WE'RE PRETTY OPTIMISTIC THAT BY THE TIME WE CONVENE, UM, PRIOR TO THE SPRING SEMESTER NEXT YEAR, UM, THAT EITHER, UH, SIGNAL EITHER IN CONSTRUCTION OR ACTIVATING PROJECT.
SO, UM, YEAH, THAT PROJECT, UH, JUST FOR FULL DISCLOSURE, THERE'S TWO SIGNALS IN THAT PROJECT.
ONE IS AT, UM, PACIFIC AVENUE DEN STREET.
UM, THE OTHER ISN'T AS CLOSELY LOCATED TO A SCHOOL, IT'S UP AT THE FAR REACHES OF THE CITY UP IN ATLANTIC WHERE DIVERGES FROM ATLANTIC PLACE, THE 91 FREEWAY RIGHT THERE.
UM, BOTH OF THOSE WERE IDENTIFIED AS PLACE WHERE WE SHOULD BE TRAFFIC.
POINT HEARD AND I WHOLEHEARTEDLY AGREE AND WE'RE ALREADY DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
UH, UP NEXT WOULD JUST WOULD BE, UM, PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.
THIS IS TO RECOMMEND THE CITY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE INSTALLATION OF A SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT STREET AND PACIFIC AVENUE.
UM, MR. CLERK, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE? MEMBER BAILEY.
WOULD YOU MIND READING ITEM NUMBER FOUR, PLEASE? ITEM FOUR IS THE RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE FINDINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 10.68 OF THE LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE AND RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE REMOVAL OF SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND WALNUT AVENUE AND 10TH STREET AND ORVA AVENUE.
I MAKE A MOTION FOR THIS ITEM.
UH, DID YOU PLACE THE NAMES FOR THAT ONE? OH, YEP.
UM, I HAD THE MOTION AS MEMBER GOLDEN AND THE SECONDER AS MEMBER MORI.
SO AS, UH, RYAN HAD MENTIONED, UM, YOU KNOW, IN ORDER TO PLACE THE GUARDS AT NEW DEFINED HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS, UM, WILL NEED TO, UM, RELOCATE, UM, THE GUARDS IN ORDER TO FILL THOSE.
UM, SO AT PREVIOUS MEETINGS HERE WE TALKED ABOUT THE BEST WAY TO, UH, AGAIN, DRAW INSPIRATION FROM THE CODE, FROM THE VOTER INITIATIVE THAT ESTABLISH THIS COMMITTEE AND PROVIDE OBJECTIVE FOR PRIORITIZING THE GUARDS.
[00:15:01]
THAT BASED ON THE FEEDBACK FROM THIS COMMITTEE, UM, THE FACTORS THAT WERE THEN DETERMINED.UM, SO IF RYAN, IF YOU COULD EXPLAIN, UM, THE JUSTIFICATION FOR WHY THESE TWO LOCATIONS, UM, THE LOCATIONS OF PCH WALNUT AND 10TH OR ZABA, UM, DRAWING FROM THAT PRIORITIZATION, UM, WOULD BE RECOMMENDED FOR RELOCATION TO THE HAZARDOUS.
UH, SO YEAH, LAST YEAR WE ESTABLISHED, YOU KNOW, A LIST OF HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS AND THE LIST OF NON-HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS IN TERMS OF RELOCATING, UH,
SO IF YOU'LL SEE IN THE ATTACHMENTS, UH, I THINK RIGHT NEXT TO, YEAH, UNDER ITEM THREE WE HAVE THE SIGNAL CONTROLLED STUDY FOR EAST CH WALNUT AND THE UNCONTROLLED CROSSING STUDY FOR 10TH
AND YOU CAN SEE FOR THE PCH WALNUT FOR WHITTIER, UH, THE CROSSING DOES NOT HAVE AT LEAST 20 SCHOOL CHILDREN PER HOUR.
IT'S ONLY 13, SO THAT CRITERION IS NOT MET.
IN ADDITION TO THAT, UH, THERE'S, IT'S KIND OF A HARD TO EXPLAIN CRITERION, BUT IT, IT IS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF CONFLICTING TURNING VEHICLE MOVEMENTS THAT GO THROUGH THE CROSSWALK WHEN SCHOOL AGED PEDESTRIANS MAY BE CROSSING.
AND THAT THRESHOLD IS 150 AT OVER 150 SUCH VEHICLES PER 15 MINUTES.
AND THIS LOCATION WAS FOUND AT 82.
SO IT MISSED ON BOTH CRITERIA AND THEREFORE WOULDN BE DEEMED THE HAZARDOUS LOCATION FOR 10TH STREET OR ZAPPA.
UH, THAT'S A LOCATION, IT'S UNCONTROLLED 'CAUSE THE CROSSING IS ON THE EAST LAKE OF 10TH STREET, UH, WHERE THERE, I THINK IT'S STOP CONTROL NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND STOP SIGNS ON 10TH STREET, BUT NOTHING ON THERE IS A MARKED CROSSWALK.
THERE ARE, UH, RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASH BEACONS.
THERE ARE CS THERE THAT HAVEN'T FOR SEVERAL YEARS AT THAT LOCATION.
UH, AGAIN, THE, UH, THE SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING VOLUME WARRANT WAS NOT MET.
UH, THERE HAVE TO BE AT LEAST 20 CHILDREN PER HOUR.
UH, BEYOND THAT, THE OTHER TWO CRITERIA WERE MET.
UM, THERE HAS TO BE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF SEPARATION BETWEEN THAT, THAT CROSSING AND THE NEXT CONTROLLED CROSSWALK.
THERE IS THAT AMOUNT OF SEPARATION AND IN TERMS OF THE ULAR VOLUMES, THERE WERE SUFFICIENT VOLUMES ALONG 10TH STREET, BUT, UH, THEY'RE JUST MORE INSUFFICIENT SCHOOL-AGED PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES.
SO THAT'S WHY THESE TWO LOCATIONS CAN BE FORMALLY DEEMED NOT HAZARDOUS AND THE ADULT CROSSING GUARDS CAN BE REASSIGNED TO THE, UH, THE TWO PROPOSED HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS.
ANY FURTHER? ANY DISCUSSION? SORRY, I HAVE A QUESTION.
SO YOU SAID THAT, UH, THE LOCATION OF NET SPECIFIC IS GOING TO GET A SIGNAL WHEN THAT HAPPENS.
ARE YOU GONNA PULL THE CROSS BOARD OUT THERE? SO ONCE THE CONDITION CHANGES, WE'LL NEED TO REEVALUATE BECAUSE THAT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE, RIGHT? WHETHER THERE'S A TRAFFIC SIGNAL OR NOT.
NOTICE THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENT HEADERS ON THESE WORKSHEETS RIGHT HERE, RIGHT? THE ONE FOR WILLARD, UM, THE SUBTITLE IS UNCONTROLLED CROSSING STUDY.
UH, THE WORKSHEET FOR WINDIER, UH, IS A SIGNAL CONTROL CROSSING STUDY.
UH, AND SO IF YOU LOOK AND COMPARE THE TWO SIDE BY SIDE, BUT THERE ARE DIFFERENT FACTORS WE HAVE TO CONSIDER.
UM, BECAUSE PACIFIC AVENUE, UM, IS ALREADY, UM, NOTED WITHIN OUR, OUR TRANSPORTATION PLANS IS A HIGH INJURY NETWORK SEGMENT.
UM, IT MAY STILL PERSIST, UM, AS A PLACE THAT WOULD WARRANT A GUARD EVEN UNDER A TRAFFIC SIGNAL OF CONTROL.
UM, SO YEAH, I DON'T WANT TO MAKE ANY PROMISES RIGHT NOW OTHER THAN THESE WILL, UH, CRUNCH THE NUMBERS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO DO.
THE ONLY REASON I ASK, I WONDERED IF
YES, WE ARE, UH, CONTINUING TO ORDER.
I KNOW THAT THE REASON WHY THE WILLARD, UM,
[00:20:03]
SO THEY'VE HAD CROSSING GUARD FOR QUITE A WHILE.AND THE QUESTION IS, IS IF WE LOOK AT THE, UM, WILLARD ANALYSIS ON THIS PAGE, AND THEN I, I THINK IT IS ON, UM, THE AGENDA DOWN HERE.
BUT HOW DO WE, IF WE LOOK AT THE LOWER ANALYSIS HERE AND THEN WE LOOK AT THE SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS, IT'S SHOWING LIKE DIFFERENT INFORMATION.
SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE HERE? BECAUSE THEN WE'RE SEEING, UM, THE MAXIMUM
SO WHAT'S, WHAT ARE WE COMPARING, I MEAN, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE HERE? UH, THE DIFFERENCE THERE IS, UM, FOR THE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS THAT ARE CROSSING THE CROSSING WHERE THE CROSSING GUARD IS AT, UH, THE NUMBER IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IS THE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CROSSING ALL LEGS OF THE INTERSECTION IN THE PEAK OUT.
SO THAT INCLUDES PEOPLE CROSSING, UH, THE STUFF.
AND THEN IF I LOOK AT THE PERCENTAGE OF COLLISIONS DURING SCHOOL, PEAK HOURS BEING 20% HERE TO, HOW IS THAT FACTORED IN? OR IS IT THAT'S FACTORED IN IN TERMS OF THE, THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION? UH, THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IS, IS COMPLETELY BOARD AFTER THIS LOCATION ANALYSIS IS WHAT WE HAVE.
BUT YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT SO MANY ADULT CROSSING GUARDS AND ONLY SO MANY INTERSECTIONS THAT ACTUALLY ARE CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS.
SO THERE'S, THERE ARE MORE CROSSING GUARDS.
SO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS WAS SET UP TO FIGURE OUT WHERE YOU PUT THE SUPPLE, THE GUARDS THAT AREN'T REQUIRED TO RELOCATED, YOU KNOW, HOW ALL THOSE DIFFERENT FACTORS, UH, YOU KNOW, ALL THE SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS THAT'RE CROSSING THE INTERSECTION, UH, DURING HOUR VISIONS, SCHOOL AGE, PEDESTRIAN VISIONS, UM, AND THEN THE SPEED LIMIT, UH, THE SPEED THAT, UH, VEHICLES ON THE ROAD ARE TRAVELING AT.
ALL THOSE FACTORS GO INTO, UH, COMING WITH PRIORITIZATIONS OR NOT AT THIS LOCATION.
SO THEY'RE, THEY'RE, THEY'RE TOTALLY SEPARATE.
AND MR. KELLY, WOULD YOU MIND EXPLAINING WHY THESE TWO WERE SELECTED FOR THE EVALUATION FROM THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITY LIST? UH, THEY WERE, THEY WERE SELECTED FOR REEVALUATION BECAUSE THEY SCORED LOW ON THE SUPPLEMENTAL PART.
LOOK AT THE, UH, LIKE THE TOP 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 LOCATIONS ON THE SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS.
THOSE ALL CURRENTLY HAVE ADULT FROSTING GUARDS ALSO AREN'T HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS, BUT BECAUSE THEY DO HAVE HIGH SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES, HIGH PERCENTAGES OF, UH, OF COLLISIONS DURING THE SCHOOL PEAK HOUR, UH, HIGHER TRAVEL SPEEDS FOR VEHICLES ON THE ROADWAY, WE WOULDN'T WANT TO TAKE FROM THERE.
WE'D WANT TO TAKE FROM LOCATIONS THAT ARE LOWER ON THAT LIST.
THAT'S HOW WE ENDED UP WITH THE, UH, LOCATIONS FROM A YEAR.
WILLER ANY, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ONCE THOSE, UM, I, I NEED TO HEAR FROM THE COMMISSION.
I WAS JUST GONNA, I KNOW THAT WE'RE TRYING TO HIRE, WE JUST GOT PEOPLE, UH, SO, UH, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, TINY, UH, WE'VE GOT TWO MORE THAT HAVE HAD BEEN RECEIVED OFFERS.
THEY'RE STILL GOING THROUGH THE, THE BACKGROUND CHECKS.
SO WE, WE YEAH, WE KEEP THAT, UM, APPLICATION OPEN.
IF THAT'S IT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS, WE WILL OPEN IT UP TO SOME PUBLIC COMMENT ON
[00:25:01]
THIS ITEM.I QUESTION THE, THE SITE THAT YOU'RE GOING TO PUT THE LIGHTS AND SIGNALS ON AND EVERYTHING AND YOU SAY YOU'RE GONNA GO BACK OUT AND REASSESS IT AGAIN LATER.
IS THE PURPOSE OF THE RIGHT TO MAKE IT MORE SAFER THERE? UH, SO YEAH.
QUESTIONS WE CAN ANSWER AFTER THE MEETING.
UH, IF THERE'S PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THEIR DECISIONS, UH, NOW'S THE TIME.
HAPPY ANSWER THAT QUESTION AFTER, AFTER THE MEETING.
UM, THEN, UH, MR. KIRK, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE MEMBER BAILEY MEMBER BROWN SHOP? YES.
AND MEMBER VANDY OR CHAIR VAN D**E? YES.
ALRIGHT, AND, UM, WOULD YOU PLEASE, UH, READ ITEM NUMBER FIVE FOR US, MR. COURT? ITEM FIVE IS THE RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE A SUMMARY OF THE UPDATED SUPPLEMENTAL PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS, IDENTIFYING PRIORITIZATION FACTORS FOR CROSSING GUARD PLACE AND NON-HAZARDOUS LOCATION FILE.
AND WE HAVE A MOTION BY, UH, MEMBER MALLORY AND A SECOND BY MEMBER BROWN SHOCK.
ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS PANEL? UH, DISTRICT KELLY? SURE ON THERE.
UH, SO THE LAST TIME YOU SAW THIS TABLE, IT HAD 24 INTERSECTIONS.
UH, THAT NUMBER HAD BEEN INCREASED TO 49.
UH, THERE ARE SIX NEWLY PROPOSED LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDED.
ONE THAT'S BEEN REMOVED THE 17TH AND NI ROW, THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE A HALFISH LOCATION.
UM, WE ALSO, FOR MEMBER MALLORY'S REQUEST, ADDED A COLUMN FOR WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS AN RFB AT THE CROSSING LOCATION.
UH, BUT YOU CAN SEE THAT, UH, AND I THINK ALL THE CROSSING STUDIES ARE INCLUDED IN THESE ATTACHMENTS.
FELLOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, ORANGE AND PHILLIPS FOR HARD.
UH, LET'S SEE, LONG BEACH AND 67TH FOR KING ELEMENTARY, CABO AND RUTGERS FOR CARVER TERMINAL AND SIXTH FOR MAPLE VILLAGE.
WALDORF AND CABO AND MONTE FOR CARVER BRA ANALYZED TO DETERMINE TO BE NON-HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS.
AND UP ON THIS TABLE, UH, REALLY PROPOSED LOCATIONS.
UH, THEY'RE ON THAT SECOND OF THE TABLE.
UH, I GUESS THE, THE HIGHEST POINT BEING, UH, FIXED FEE AND RIDGE LONG.
NO FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE SIDE.
HOW YOU DECIDE NEW INTERSECTION.
MOVE WE IN LAST, UH, HOW DO YOU PICK ONE? UH, WE GET REQUESTS.
UH, FROM THE PUBLIC, FROM SCHOOLS LIKE CARVER.
OUR ELEMENTARY REVIEW WENT ON.
BOTH, UH, YEAH, BASICALLY ANYONE CAN ASK FOR IT.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? WE'LL OPEN IT TO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.
UM, MR. CLERK, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE? MEMBER BAILEY? YES.
NOW, UH, WE CAN PROCEED TO NON AGENDA, PUBLIC COMMENT.
SO, UH, IF ANYONE'S ATTENDING FROM THE PUBLIC HAS ANY COMMENTS ON THINGS OFF THE AGENDA, UM, NOW'S THE
[00:30:01]
TIME FOR THAT.UM, OTHERWISE, UH, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ANNOUNCEMENTS.
ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR THE COMMISSIONERS? UH, UH, FOR TODAY MEETING TAKE ADJOURN.
DO YOU NEED A MOTION, A SECOND FOR ADJOURNMENT? NOPE, WE'RE GOOD.
ALRIGHT, WELL, UH, MEETING ADJOURNED.