[00:15:27]
[00:15:29]
GOOD[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:15:30]
EVENING.[00:15:30]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER FOR MARCH 5TH.[ROLL CALL]
THE ROLL.[PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE]
OF ALLEGIANCE.COMMISSIONER CLING, WOULD YOU MIND DOING THE HONORS? PLEASE? RISE.
[REGULAR AGENDA]
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.EVERYONE, IF YOU CAN NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT, UH, VICE CHAIR WARE HAS, UH, IN PRESENT IN THE MEETING.
UH, WE'LL GO TO, UM, FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND READING THAT.
[1. 26-54492 Recommendation to receive and file Director’s Report. Suggested Action: Approve recommendation. ]
ONE IS A RECOMMENDATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE DIRECTOR'S REPORT.UM, THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER TEMPLIN AND A SECOND.
GOOD EVENING, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.
UM, WANTED TO UPDATE YOU THAT EARLIER THIS WEEK ON TUESDAY EVENING, THE CITY COUNCIL HEARD YOUR RECOMMENDATION, UM, RELATED TO THE PROJECT AT 400 EAST ANAHEIM STREET.
THAT'S THE 161, UM, UNIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, UH, THAT THIS BODY APPROVED, UM, AT THE BEGINNING, TOWARDS THE BEGINNING OF THIS YEAR.
BUT THERE WAS A REQUEST FOR WHAT'S CALLED ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE.
AND THIS IS OUR FIRST TIME PROCESSING SUCH A REQUEST UNDER THE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE, WHERE A PROJECT CAN REQUEST TO COMPLY IN A DIFFERENT WAY THAN SORT OF THE LETTER OF THE CODE.
AND IN THIS CASE, THEY WERE, UM, UH, REQUESTING TO DO MORE UNITS, BUT AT THE DIFFERENT AFFORDABILITY LEVEL.
UM, SO IT WAS A REALLY GREAT, UM, DISCUSSION WITH COUNSEL, AND THEY ULTIMATELY CONCURRED WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVED THAT ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE METHOD.
UH, SO I WANTED TO CIRCLE BACK AND LET YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT.
WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO SEE THAT PROJECT, UM, MOVING FORWARD IN THE PROCESS.
UM, AND THEN ONE OTHER UPDATE.
UM, SOME OF YOU AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY KNOW MARGARET MADDEN FROM OUR OFFICE.
SHE'S BEEN RUNNING THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM FOR A COUPLE OF DECADES HERE AT THE CITY, AND TODAY IS HER LAST DAY.
UH, SHE'S RETIRING AND SO JUST WANNA WISH HER WELL, UM, AND CONGRATULATE HER ON 31 YEARS WITH THE CITY.
SO, UH, SHE DID THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM IN 1992 AND JOINED THE CITY IN 1994.
AND, UH, TODAY IS HER LAST DAY.
SO JUST WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO RECOGNIZE HER FOR ALL OF YES.
CONGRATULATIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS HERE TO THE, UH, COMMUNITY.
UH, AND THAT, UH, THAT CONCLUDES MY DIRECTOR'S REPORT.
ANY QUESTIONS OF THE DIRECTOR? OKAY.
SEEING NONE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
UH, MARGARET ALSO ON THE SERVICE.
IT'S, UH, YOU KNOW, I KNOW WHAT IT'S LIKE TO WORK IN THE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS, AND IT'S GREAT TO SEE SOMEBODY, UH, GIVE THEIR CAREER TO IT AND RETIRE.
ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON, UH, THIS ITEM, A DIRECTOR'S REPORT.
ANY VIRTUAL COMMENTS? IF YOU'RE JOINING US VIRTUALLY AND WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE USE THE REIGN RAISE HAND FUNCTION AT THIS TIME.
UH, MAD IF THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS OR I GONNA CLERK, PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE.
COMMISSIONER LEMI, I CAN TAKE A VERBAL, UH, YES.
[2. 26-54493 Recommendation to approve the minutes for the Planning Commission meeting of Thursday, February 19, 2026. Suggested Action: Approve recommendation. ]
TWO IS A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 19TH, 2026.CAN I ENTERTAIN A MAKER AND A SECOND PLEASE? COMMISSIONER TEMPLE.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE, TO THE MINUTES SCENE?
[00:20:01]
NONE.WE'LL NOT TAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE.
ANY VIRTUAL COMMENTS? IF YOU'RE JOINING US VIRTUALLY AND WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION AT THIS TIME.
MADAM CLERK, PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE.
[3. 26-54512 Recommendation to determine the finding of conformance with the General Plan is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Edison Avenue, situated immediately west of Block 21 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 9th Street and bounded southerly by Parcel C of said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-003) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-18); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Jackson Avenue, situated between Block 21, and Block 22 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 9th Street and bounded southerly by Lot H of said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-004) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-19); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Lot H of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by the easterly line of Edison Avenue of said tract and bounded easterly by Parcel 1, as shown on the record of survey filed in Book 128, Page 15 through 20, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-005) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-20); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Jackson Avenue, situated immediately west of Block 9 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 12th Street North and bounded southerly by 9th Street of said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-006) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-21); Find the proposed vacation of a 10.38-foot-wide segment of an unnamed alleyway, situated within Block 9 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Jackson Avenue and bounded easterly by Santa Fe Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-007) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-22); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Santa Fe Avenue, situated between Block 9 and Block 10 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 12th Street North and bounded southerly by 9th Street, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-008) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-23); Find the proposed vacation of an unnamed alleyway (15- and 20-foot-wide segments), situated completely within Block 10 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Santa Fe Avenue and bounded easterly by Canal Street, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-009) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-24); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Canal Avenue, situated between Block 10 and Block 11 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 12th Street North and bounded southerly by 9th Street, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-010) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-25); Find the proposed vacation of an unnamed alleyway (approximately 10.4-foot-wide), situated completely within Block 15 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Canal Avenue and bounded easterly by Caspian Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-011) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-26); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of 11th Street, situated between Block 11 and Block 15 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Canal Avenue and bounded easterly by Caspian Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-012) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-27); Find the proposed vacation of a 20-foot-wide unnamed alleyway, situated completely within Block 11 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Canal Avenue and bounded easterly by Caspian Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-013) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-28); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of 12th Street South, situated immediately north of Block 10 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Santa Fe Avenue and bounded easterly by Canal Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-014) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-29); Find the proposed vacation of a 20-foot-wide unnamed alleyway, situated completely within Block 12 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Caspian Avenue and bounded easterly by Harbor Boulevard, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-015) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-30); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of 11th Street, situated between Block 12 and Block 16 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Caspian Avenue and bounded easterly by Harbor Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-016) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-31); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of a 20-foot-wide unnamed alleyway, situated completed within Block 16 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Caspian Avenue and bounded easterly by Harbor Avenue, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-017) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-32); Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Harbor Avenue, situated between Block 16 and Block 17 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by 11th Street and bounded southerly by a direct line between the southeasterly corner of Lot 25, Block 16 and the southwesterly corner of Lot 12, Block 17 of the said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-018) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-33); Find the proposed vacation of a 20-foot-wide unnamed alleyway situated completed within Block 17 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded westerly by Harbor Avenue and bounded easterly by Fashion Avenue of the said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-019) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-34); and Find the proposed vacation of a segment of Fashion Avenue situated between Block 17 and Block 18 of Long Beach Harbor Tract, bounded northerly by a direct line between the most southeasterly corner of Lot 11, Block 17, and the most southwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 18, and bounded southerly by Franklin Street of the said tract, in conformity with the adopted goals and policies of the City’s General Plan (GPC25-020) in the Port-Related Industrial (IP) Zoning District (Case No. 2511-35). (District 7) Suggested Action: Approve recommendation. ]
A RECOMMENDATION TO DETERMINE THE FINDING OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PER SECTION 1 5 3 7 8 OF THE CQA GUIDELINES, FIND THE PROPOSED VACATIONS OF CASES, NUMBERS 25 11 DASH 18 25 11, 19 25, 11 DASH 20 25, 11 21 25, 11 DASH 22 25, 11 DASH 23 25, 11 DASH 24 25, 11 DASH 25 25, 11 DASH 26 25, 11 DASH 27 25, 11 DASH 28 25, 11 DASH 29 25, 11 30 25, 11 DASH 31 25, 11 DASH 32 25, 11 DASH 33 25, 11 DASH 34, AND 25 11 DASH 35, DISTRICT SEVEN.CAN WE HAVE, UH, UNDERSTAND MAKER AND A MOTION FOR THIS, UH, UH, MAKER AND A SECOND COMMISSIONER, CLEMSON COMMISSIONER.
AS ITEM HAS BEEN MOVED IN A SECOND.
WE'LL NOW TURN IT OVER TO STAFF REPRESENTATION.
THANK YOU CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.
I'M GONNA TURN THIS OVER TO, UM, GLENN, OUR PROJECT PLANNER IN JUST A MOMENT.
UH, JUST, UM, AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S MANY COMPONENTS TO THIS PROJECT.
IT'S A, IT'S, UM, A LARGE IT, UH, THIS IS TO SUPPORT A LARGE PROJECT RELATED TO THE PEER B ON DOCK RAIL SUPPORT FACILITY, WHICH IS A BIG PART OF THE PORT'S, UM, GREENPORT INITIATIVE.
UM, AND IS ANTICIPATED TO HELP DIRECTLY CONNECT THE PORT TO THE ALAMEDA CORRIDOR SO THAT YOU COULD REDUCE, UM, A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF TRUCK TRIPS.
THE LATEST ESTIMATE I SAW WAS REDUCE 146 MILLION TRUCK MILES ANNUALLY BY CREATING THIS, UH, DIRECT RAIL CONNECTION.
SO I'M EXCITED TO, UH, BRING FORWARD THIS PROJECT.
UH, GLEN WILL PROVIDE THE PRESENTATION.
GOOD EVENING CHAIR, VICE CHAIR, AND MEMBERS OF THE PLAN COMMISSION.
THE ITEM BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A REQUEST FOR OUR GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION FOR A PROPOSED VACATION OF A TOTAL OF 18 RIGHT OF WAY SEGMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT A PLAN COMMISSION'S ROLE TONIGHT IS LIMITED TO GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION.
IF CONFORMITY IS DETERMINED TONIGHT, STAFF FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILL FINALIZE THE RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATIONS BY PRESENTING THEM TO, UM, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND DECISION.
THE PROJECT AREA IS DESCRIBED AS THE LOWER WEST SIDE OR PB.
THE AREA IS ZONE PORT, PORT RELATED INDUSTRIAL.
THE GENERAL PLANT DESIGNATION IS A REGIONAL SERVING FACILITY.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT INVOLVES ONLY RIGHT OF WAY SEGMENTS SURROUNDED BY PRIMARILY, UM, INDUSTRIAL USES AND STORAGE YARDS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT, UH, PRIVATE BUSINESSES, UH, IN THIS AREA HAVE BEEN BOUGHT OUT AND RELOCATED BY THE PORT OF LONG BEACH.
THIS SLIDE INTENDS TO PROVIDE THE PLAN COMMISSION WITH THE BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT.
THE PEER B ON DOCK REAL SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT WAS APPROVED BY THE HARBOR COMMISSION TO IMPROVE CARGO MOVEMENT AND ADVANCE THE, UH, GREENPORT INITIATIVE.
THE PROJECT BROKE GROUND ON JULY 18TH, 2024, RIGHT OF RIGHT OF WAY VACATIONS ARE NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THIS, UH, SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT BACK IN 2024.
THE PLAN COMMISSION DETERMINED A GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FOR A TOTAL OF FIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY SEGMENTS, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS THE PHASE ONE OF THE, UM, RIGHT OF WAY VACATION EFFORT.
NOW THE PROJECT IS BEING HEARD BY THE, UH, PLAN COMMISSION IS THE PHASE TWO, WHICH CONSISTS OF A TOTAL OF 18 RIGHT OF WAY SEGMENTS.
PLEASE NOTE THAT, UM, IF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY IS DETERMINED BY THE PLAN COMMISSION TONIGHT, THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILL FINALIZE THE PROPOSED VACATIONS BY TAKING THEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND DECISIONS.
THIS SLIDE PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 18 RIGHT OFF WAY SEGMENTS BEING PROPOSED FOR VACATIONS AS, UM, THE PHASE TWO VACATION EFFORT IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT THE SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT AT PRB STAFF WILL GO OVER EACH SEGMENT BASED ON THEIR MAIN CHARACTERISTIC, WHICH INCLUDES DEAD ENDS, ALLEYS, LOCAL STREETS, AND VACANT LOT.
[00:25:01]
THIS SLIDE SHOWS, UM, THIS SLIDE SHOWS TWO DEAD ENDS OF JACKSON AVENUE AND EDISON AVENUE.WHILE BOTH OF THEM ARE ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC, THE SEGMENT OF THE JACKSON AVENUE, UM, AT THE LOWER RIGHT CORNER, UM, OF THE SCREEN IS UN PAVED.
THIS SLIDE SHOWS FOUR ALLEYWAYS.
THEIR ACCESSIBILITY IS LIMITED AS THEIR EITHER FENCED OR NOT ENTIRELY PAVED.
THIS SLIDE CONTAINS, UM, THREE ADDITIONAL ALLEYWAYS.
ONLY THE ALLEY ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN IS PAVED.
THIS SLIDE SHOWS, UH, FOUR SEGMENTS OF LOCAL STREETS.
THERE ARE ALL, UH, THROUGH ROWS WITH EXISTING SIDEWALKS.
AND NOW, UH, WE'RE LOOKING AT FOUR ADDITIONAL SEGMENTS OF LOCAL STREETS.
THERE ARE, UM, ALSO THROUGH ROADS, HOWEVER, THEY DON'T HAVE EXISTING SIDEWALKS.
UH, THIS IS A VACANT UNPAVED LOT, UH, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTHERN SOUTHERN, UM, PACIFIC RAIL.
IT'S, UH, 20 FOOT WIDE AND UNPAVED AS DISCUSSED.
UM, THE PLAN COMMISSION WILL DETERMINE THE GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY OF EACH OF THE 18 PROPOSED VACATIONS IN ORDER, UH, FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO FINAL OUT THE, UH, WRITE OFF WAY VACATION PROJECT BY TAKING THEM TO, UM, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND DECISIONS.
ACCORDING TO FINDINGS SUBMITTED TO THE, THE PLAN COMMISSION AS ATTACHMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROJECT CONFORMS TO THE GOALS AND POLICIES AS OUTLINED IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND THE MOBILITY ELEMENT OF, UM, THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY AS THE PROJECT IS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT AT PRB, WHICH IS A KEY PORT, UM, INFRASTRUCTURE TO IMPROVE CARGO MOVEMENT EFFICIENCY, MINIMIZE TRUCK TRIPS, AND ULTIMATELY IMPROVE AIR QUALITY.
REGARDING MOBILITY ELEMENT, THE PROJECT WILL REDUCE, UH, TRAFFIC CONFLICT BY SHIFTING CARGO MOVEMENTS RELIANCE, UH, FROM TRUCKS TO RAIL.
FURTHER, UM, THE VACATIONS OF THE ALLEYWAYS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED TO IMPACT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AS MOST OFTEN ARE NOT ACCESSIBLE.
THE AREA IS LOCATED WITH THE, IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN OR CLOSE TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND THE SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT WILL MODERNIZE AND CONSOLIDATE ROADWAY NETWORK IN THE AREA TO IMPROVE, UM, TRAFFIC SAFETY FOR PA PLAN COMMISSION'S.
DECISION TONIGHT IS NOT SUBJECT TO CQA, BUT, UH, STAFF, UM, LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE UL ATIONS, UM, WERE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A PB SUPPORT FACILITY PROJECT.
AS FOR PUBLIC NOTICING, WHILE TONIGHT'S, UM, REVIEW AND DECISIONS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ANY PUBLIC NOTICING REQUIREMENTS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILL, UM, CONDUCT NECESSARY PUBLIC NOTIFICATION BEFORE THE PROJECT IS, UM, TAKEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE LAW.
WITH THAT STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE, UM, PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINE EACH OF THE PROPOSED 18 RIGHT OF WAIT VACATION IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN.
EACH CASE NUMBER IS LISTED ON THE SCREEN.
PLEASE NOTE THAT, UM, FOR, UM, THE EASE OF A COMMUNICATION STAFF COMBINED ALL 18 SEPARATE YET RELATED, UH, CASES IN ONE PRESENTATION, THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEEDS TO TAKE INDIVIDUAL ACTION ON EACH CASE.
THIS CONCLUDES STAFF'S PRESENTATION PLANNING STAFF, UM, AND A REPRESENTATIVE DAVID TRAN FROM THE PORT OF LONG BEACH ARE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTION THAT A COMMISSION MAY HAVE.
UM, COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER TEMPLATE? UH, JUST A CLARIFICATION, UH, BESIDES THE 18TH STREET, UH, VACATIONS, UH, DO, IS THERE A 19TH ONE WHERE WE DO, UM, THE FINDING OF, UH, CONFIRMATION FOR THE, UH, CA SECTION? THERE? THERE IS, IS THERE ALSO A, UH, A VOTE UPON? THERE IS, UH, ONLY A TOTAL OF 18 CASES AND, UM, THERE IS A PARCEL, IT'S, UM, NAMED TWO M THAT'S, UM, HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT.
BUT IF YOU, UH, LOOK AT THE, UM, APPLICATION NUMBERS, THERE ARE ONLY 18 SEPARATE CASES.
YES, WE WILL DO THE VOTE ON THE SE A SEPARATE, SO
[00:30:01]
IT'LL BE 19 TOTAL VOTES.I SEE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM STAFF? OKAY.
UH, DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK OR JUST YOU? YOU, YOU DON'T HAVE TO
THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
UH, ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? ANYONE SEEING NONE? ANY VIRTUAL COMMENTS? IF YOU'RE JOINING VIRTUALLY AND WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION AT THIS TIME.
ANY, UH, FURTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? SEEING NONE, UH, MADAM CLERK, PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE.
SO JUST TO CONFIRM WITH THE ATTORNEY, WE WILL BE TAKING 19 SEPARATE VOTES.
SO IT'LL BE, I KNOW, JUST BEAR WITH US.
UM, BUT YES, IF YOU COULD TAKE 19 VOTES AND THEN ONE SEPARATE ON THE SEQUENCE.
IF YOU'RE FOLLOWING ALONG AT HOME OR AT THE DAAS, IT WILL GO PARAGRAPH BY PARAGRAPH THROUGH THE RECOMMENDATION.
SO OPENING THE VOTE FOR THE SE QA RECOMMENDATION.
SO TO BE CLEAR, THE FIRST VOTE IS ON THE RECOMMENDATION TO FIND, UM, THE CONFORMANCE OF THE GENERAL PLAN IS A, NOT A PROJECT UNDER SE QL PER SECTION 1 5 3 7 8 OF THE SE QL GUIDELINES.
AT THIS POINT WE'RE JUST VOTING ON THE FIRST PART OF THE AGENDA ITEM.
SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE AGENDA AS THE FIRST ITEM.
NOW WE'LL, UH, TAKE A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR THE SECOND PORTION OF THIS ITEM, WHICH IS, UH, THE VACATION.
WE'RE JUST SPLITTING THE BOAT.
WE CAN, WE CAN USE THE SAME MOTION MAKER AND SECOND MAKER.
BUT WE WILL JUST TAKE EACH VOTE SEPARATELY.
SO THE NEXT VOTE IS ON, UM, CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 18.
AT THIS POINT, WE'LL, UH, THANK YOU FOR EVERYONE FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.
THE NEXT ITEM IS, UH, PUBLIC COMMENTS.
ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? OH, WE HAVE TO VOTE 17 MORE TIMES.
WE TOOK PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM, CORRECT? VOTE? YEP.
SO WE'RE JUST BREAKING THE VOTE.
YOU'LL HAVE, I BELIEVE THERE'S 18 IN FRONT OF YOU, SO IT'S GONNA BE 19 TOTAL VOTES WE'RE TWO IN.
I THOUGHT WE WERE VOTING ON ALL OF THEM AS A, AS A BATCH.
SO THAT WAS THAT FIRST PARAGRAPH, WHICH IS CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 18.
WHICH IS THAT SEGMENT OF, OF EDISON AVENUE.
WE HAVEN'T BROUGHT THIS MANY TO YOU AS ONE PACKAGE BEFORE.
MOTION IS CARRIED FOR CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 19.
SO CHAIR, THE NEXT VOTE IS ON 20 IS ON CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 20.
SO, UH, JUST, UH, FROM A PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE PERSPECTIVE, DO WE HAVE TO ANNOUNCE EACH ONE? WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE COMMENTS ON EACH OF THEM.
NO, WE'VE ALREADY DONE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE WHOLE OF THE ITEM.
IT'S A GREAT PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURAL QUESTION.
SO WE HAVE FULFILLED OUR OBLIGATIONS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND WE'RE JUST MOVING THROUGH VOTING.
MOTION IS CARRIED FOR CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 20.
NEXT ITEM, ITEM 20 25 11 DASH 21.
MOTION IS CARRIED FOR 25 11 DASH 21.
WE NOW WE'LL VOTE ON NEXT ITEM 25 11 DASH 22.
MOTION IS CARRIED FOR 25 11 DASH 22.
[00:35:05]
NEXT VOTE IS ITEM 25 11 DASH 23, OR CASE NUMBER, I SHOULD SAY.ON THE NEXT ITEM, CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 24.
UH, ITEM NUMBER 25 11 DASH 25.
NEXT ITEM IS ITEM 25 11 DASH 26.
ITEM CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 28.
ITEM CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 29.
CASE NUMBER 25 11 DASH 30 SAYING, YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION TOO.
'CAUSE THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL MOTION.
I SECOND THE ORIGINAL MOTION AND SOMEHOW IT'S DIFFERENT PEOPLE NOW.
SO, CLERK, CAN WE PLEASE MAKE CLEAR THAT ACROSS ALL OF THESE VOTES WE'RE STAYING WITH THE ORIGINAL MOTION.
AND SECOND ON THIS ITEM, THE MOTION MAKER WAS COMMISSIONER CLEMSON.
THE SECONDER WAS VICE CHAIR WARE.
I BELIEVED THE SECONDER WAS TEMPLIN, BUT I'LL UPDATE IT TO, UH, FIRST CLEMSON AND SECOND WARE.
MOTION IS CARRIED AND I BELIEVE WE'RE ON 25 11 DASH 31.
WE HAVE NEVER BEEN SO PRODUCTIVE.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS, COMMISSIONER CLEMSON.
UH, ALL THE, UH, I THINK WE HAVE, WE'RE DONE WITH THE, ALL THE AGENDA ITEMS EXCEPT FOR, UH, GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS.
[PUBLIC COMMENT Opportunity to address the Planning Commission on non-agenda items. Each speaker is limited to three minutes to make their comments unless extended by the Chair.]
SPEAK ON ANY NON AGENDIZED ITEMS AT THIS TIME.IF YOU'RE JOINING US, VIRTUALLY WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM.
PLEASE USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION AT THIS TIME.
[ANNOUNCEMENTS]
ANNOUNCEMENTS? SEEING NONE.AND ALTHOUGH I, I'M GONNA PUT IT DOWN FOR THE RECORD, THIS IS PROBABLY WITH THE FASTEST MEETING WITH THE MOST AMOUNT OF VOTES IN, IN
[00:40:01]
A, I'M GONNA JUST DECLARE THAT I DON'T, YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO ANY VALIDATION ON THAT, BUT THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS.[ADJOURNMENT]
ADJOURN THE MEETING.